All times are UTC


It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:02 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:05 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 1984
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Images: 1
And, doesn't the unchanneled version of sap will now only take one point?
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:13 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
D3+1.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:59 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 1984
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Images: 1
Draugluin wrote:
D3+1.

Ah, okay. Then you'll probably take all of a shaman's will. I guess you'd only use the channelled version in blue vs. blue when you're up against another ring wraith, or maybe against a wizard...
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:26 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
Hmm, nice points there fellows. Not many people would sap will a shaman imo, though it could happen.

How about a little twist.

Lets say the Shamans are allies to a Goblin Town list, and you don't really want to spend your points on Moria Warrios, would you still see Groblog as the more viable option?

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:33 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
That purely depends on the point size. If you want a GT army, I would say that the bare minimum would need the GG, the Scribe and Grinnah and definitely give them full warbands. Then based on how many points you have leftover I would take at least one shaman. I wouldn't take Groblog until after the 2nd shaman.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:31 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:50 am
Posts: 603
Location: In the midst of Mirkwood
Why dont you just have both?

_________________
'You would die before your stroke fell!' ~Legolas :legolas:

Check out my WIP! :meh:
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:22 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
ElfLover wrote:
Why dont you just have both?

Err, because it would be a waste. It is still only on a 5+ so one or the other.


@Draugy, thanks for your opinion.

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:46 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:50 am
Posts: 603
Location: In the midst of Mirkwood
What I meant was have Groblog and when he dies channel fury :)

_________________
'You would die before your stroke fell!' ~Legolas :legolas:

Check out my WIP! :meh:
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:54 am 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:42 am
Posts: 160
Just want to point out that drawing line of sight to the column does not matter. The rulebook states it has to be a vital part, as in weapons, terrain, and hands don't count as eligible targets. If the model was rotates and only his hand was visable behind the rock, you wouldn't be able to target him.

However I don't think there are enough LotR players to play mean like this haha. Since he is elevated but can be hidden in plain sight, i think most players should play it by ear or replace him with a normal goblin for LoS purposes.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Groblog vs Channelled Fury
PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:59 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:30 am
Posts: 2793
Location: In the Tardis Bar
Images: 1
ElfLover wrote:
What I meant was have Groblog and when he dies channel fury :)


by the time groblog dies, you probably wont have enough will to channel fury anyway. I always keep groblog within range of a shaman to help keep him alive.

Tezzy wrote:
Since he is elevated but can be hidden in plain sight, i think most players should play it by ear or replace him with a normal goblin for LoS purposes.


Most players play TLoS (true line of sight). So if Groblog is towering above the rest of his hoard, he can be shot and targetted. Never played anyone who has used a normal goblin to represent where he is. I've seen people cut him off his base.

_________________
12th GBHL 2013.
13th GBHL 2014
9th GBHL 2015



Mid Sussex Wargamers
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: