ellessar aragorn wrote:
no four sorry
Well, good math bud. 4 Isengard Trolls don't cost 300 points.
3 do though.
| The One Ring http://gbain.powweb.com/ |
|
| isengard army 3000p. http://gbain.powweb.com/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=17777 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | ellessar aragorn [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | so |
see my miniature is here yours? and i havent write all of them |
|
| Author: | Lord Hurin [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: sorry |
ellessar aragorn wrote: no four sorry
Well, good math bud. 4 Isengard Trolls don't cost 300 points. 3 do though.
|
|
| Author: | theblackcaptain [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
morgul blades is wasted on your berserkers. They already hit harder then anything else in the game (barring a few ludicrous hero combinations) and I've never seen a situation where they would be hitting on more than 4s anyways. usually they are wounding on 2s or 3s with the combo of S8 and two handed weapons so give the blades to something like a large formation of regular uruk-hai instead |
|
| Author: | Lord Hurin [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ok, I'm confused as to what's in your actual army. All the points costs you have listed are right now, but added up they total 3660 points! What exactly does your Scout Formation have? Do you have 2 Scout Formations unequipped? 2 with shields? 2 with bows? All of the above? It really isn't very clear. |
|
| Author: | ellessar aragorn [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | sorry |
yeah thats i mean okay 4 sengard troll cost 400p. and sorry i mean 3.700point army. |
|
| Author: | Lord Hurin [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: sorry |
ellessar aragorn wrote: yeah thats i mean okay 4 sengard troll cost 400p. and sorry i mean 3.700point army.
Oh ok. You can't spell OR count. I understand 
Seriously though, the vast majority of your posts are beyond hard to follow. Taking a little more time with them would help everyone understand better, I'm sure. |
|
| Author: | General Elessar [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: sorry |
Lord Hurin wrote: ellessar aragorn wrote: yeah thats i mean okay 4 sengard troll cost 400p. and sorry i mean 3.700point army. Oh ok. You can't spell OR count. I understand Seriously though, the vast majority of your posts are beyond hard to follow. Taking a little more time with them would help everyone understand better, I'm sure. He's from Greece, don't blame him. He speaks English pretty well for someone who has it as their second language. I think perhaps you owe him an apology. |
|
| Author: | DainIronfoot [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sorry dude! I am working on Spanish as a second language and I know how hard it is! Now to get on the topic of your list! A good character to put in your army is Saruman. He is a BEAST wizard and maybe the best ruin wizard! The Uruk shamans are ok but captains would be a nice addition! If you want to make a themed army take Grisnah's (no idea how to spell) hunters! You have a good collection |
|
| Author: | ellessar aragorn [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | hm |
thanks but i dont like saruman(some if see this will get   ) 
|
|
| Author: | theblackcaptain [ Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
whats not to like? hes arguably the best wizard in the game and hes the most fun to play with too! |
|
| Author: | ellessar aragorn [ Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | bl |
because of this i like most radagast and i hate him because evryone tells he is the best adn blablabla |
|
| Author: | DainIronfoot [ Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
He is probably the best EVIL wizard Gandalf, Galadriel, or Radagast could be the best Good |
|
| Author: | General Elessar [ Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I like Sauruman because he has access to the spells of Ruin, my favourite! 
|
|
| Author: | hero of gondor [ Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just use Saruman or an other wizard with the ruin spellbook, ruin wizards hit very hard or let their formation hit hard with dark fury and shatter shields. And 8 shamans is useless cause you have very small formations with that many shamans and large formation are much better with shamans cause the upgrade isn't cheap. PS: My seconde language is also Englisch and it's not that hard to learn French is much harder 
|
|
| Author: | Lord Hurin [ Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hero of gondor wrote: Just use Saruman or an other wizard with the ruin spellbook, ruin wizards hit very hard or let their formation hit hard with dark fury and shatter shields.
And 8 shamans is useless cause you have very small formations with that many shamans and large formation are much better with shamans cause the upgrade isn't cheap. PS: My seconde language is also Englisch and it's not that hard to learn French is much harder As far as I can tell, all of his formations are 6 Companies. I do agree though. Trade about 6 Shamans for Saruman and a few Captains and banners. |
|
| Author: | General Elessar [ Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree, shamans are ridicously expensive. For 25pts more, typically the equivalent of one company, you can get a Nazgul instead. |
|
| Author: | theblackcaptain [ Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bl |
ellessar aragorn wrote: because of this i like most radagast and i hate him because evryone tells he is the best adn blablabla
well everyone is entitled to an opinion i suppose...and people say hes good for a reason. he is truly one of the best mages, and leaders in the game and to be quite honest he is by far the best leader for isengard. the synergy he creates with their units is fantastic. |
|
| Author: | DainIronfoot [ Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think he is a great addition to isenguard but the one flaw he is a lot of points. I think he is worth it 
|
|
| Author: | General Elessar [ Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
DainIronfoot wrote: I think he is a great addition to isenguard but the one flaw he is a lot of points. I think he is worth it
I'll second that! |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|